🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are considering similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban remains "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to block their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for minors unless guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, support built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing dangerous online content contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain individuals to copy the Australian lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.